What I Stand For
As your member of City Council, I promise to be a proactive and innovative voice to help build a brighter future for Saskatoon.
My priorities:
- Build stronger social services and foster a sense of community and make the city safer;
- Reduce wasteful spending through innovative solutions and thoughtful planning;
- Encourage economic development by cutting red tape and stimulating growth in up-and-coming local industries;
- Invest in waste management infrastructure to turn a negative into a positive;
- Ensure elected officials make it their priority to serve their constituents, and link their pay to results.
My priorities:
- Build stronger social services and foster a sense of community and make the city safer;
- Reduce wasteful spending through innovative solutions and thoughtful planning;
- Encourage economic development by cutting red tape and stimulating growth in up-and-coming local industries;
- Invest in waste management infrastructure to turn a negative into a positive;
- Ensure elected officials make it their priority to serve their constituents, and link their pay to results.
MY PLATFORM
1) Build stronger neighbourhoods and foster a sense of community in the city
By fostering a stronger sense of community and getting neighbours to know and care for each other, we will create a stronger safety net for our citizens. Neighbours looking out for neighbours will decrease crime and can be instrumental in avoiding mental health and social crises. People who know their neighbours and feel valued in their community are less likely to feel desperate in times of need, and are more likely to successfully reach out for help. As well, when neighbours watch out and care for each other, crime decreases and quality of life increases. Supporting neighbourhood associations through financial means would be an investment that pays us back ten fold.
Instead of concentrating all festivals and attractions downtown, we need to spread them out into neighbourhoods. While beautiful, this area is fraught with problems including but not limited to a lack of parking, a lack of public toilets and a concentration of tourism to only one area of the city, meaning a very limited number of businesses can benefit from added foot traffic. Broadening the location of venues will encourage residents and tourists alike to visit all the areas of our beautiful city. We will ensure all businesses have a chance to benefit from tourism, and ensure that people from all neighbourhoods have their own special events to take pride in and get involved. We need to support and promote more initiatives like FolkFest (which brings communities together to present themselves, their foods and customs to the rest of the city), community gardens (which encourages neighbours to join forces in a common project), and SUM Theater (which brings neighbours together to watch plays). Small neighbourhood fairs, community barbecues and street festivals are more likely to create meaningful connections between citizens than large downtown events. Better communication, coordination and support between City Hall and community associations and neighbourhood level initiatives is key.
Police duties should be reviewed to ensure resources are as best allocated as possible. The police are asked to deal with everything from violent crimes to minor traffic violations, addictions to mental health crises, noise complaints and welfare checks. We ask the police to do a job they are not equipped to deal with and then doom them to failure by not providing the follow up support that would break the cycle of mental illness and addiction. We should ensure that follow up by trained professionals is given when needed in order to help people return to a place of productivity and ensure that valuable police services are not wasted. This will ensure our citizens’ needs are well met, while freeing police officers to deal with situations that require their specialized skills. In particular, there is a major disconnect between the mental health-related welfare checks that the police are being asked to do, and proper follow-up by provincial services. Reviewing, improving and advocating for a better system would ensure best outcomes. The best way to fill the gap would be to bolster the grassroots groups in the city that are currently in that space working with issues like mental illness, homelessness, addictions and other social issues. Providing resources and eliminating barriers to provide services and collaborate would be the easiest and most cost effective way forward.
Assign community liaison officers to each neighbourhood. By allowing police to get to know a neighbourhood and connect with that community we allow people to recognize people as police and we allow police to recognize people are people. Most interactions with police are associated with bad experiences, either you are in trouble with the law or you are a victim. This breeds conscious or unconscious fear of police and officers build a skewed view of people as the yonly see the worst. By bringing police back to neighbourhood patrols we would have police take ownership of their select neighbourhood, encourage pride in our police force and allow the police to find small problems before they become big problems.
By fostering a stronger sense of community and getting neighbours to know and care for each other, we will create a stronger safety net for our citizens. Neighbours looking out for neighbours will decrease crime and can be instrumental in avoiding mental health and social crises. People who know their neighbours and feel valued in their community are less likely to feel desperate in times of need, and are more likely to successfully reach out for help. As well, when neighbours watch out and care for each other, crime decreases and quality of life increases. Supporting neighbourhood associations through financial means would be an investment that pays us back ten fold.
Instead of concentrating all festivals and attractions downtown, we need to spread them out into neighbourhoods. While beautiful, this area is fraught with problems including but not limited to a lack of parking, a lack of public toilets and a concentration of tourism to only one area of the city, meaning a very limited number of businesses can benefit from added foot traffic. Broadening the location of venues will encourage residents and tourists alike to visit all the areas of our beautiful city. We will ensure all businesses have a chance to benefit from tourism, and ensure that people from all neighbourhoods have their own special events to take pride in and get involved. We need to support and promote more initiatives like FolkFest (which brings communities together to present themselves, their foods and customs to the rest of the city), community gardens (which encourages neighbours to join forces in a common project), and SUM Theater (which brings neighbours together to watch plays). Small neighbourhood fairs, community barbecues and street festivals are more likely to create meaningful connections between citizens than large downtown events. Better communication, coordination and support between City Hall and community associations and neighbourhood level initiatives is key.
Police duties should be reviewed to ensure resources are as best allocated as possible. The police are asked to deal with everything from violent crimes to minor traffic violations, addictions to mental health crises, noise complaints and welfare checks. We ask the police to do a job they are not equipped to deal with and then doom them to failure by not providing the follow up support that would break the cycle of mental illness and addiction. We should ensure that follow up by trained professionals is given when needed in order to help people return to a place of productivity and ensure that valuable police services are not wasted. This will ensure our citizens’ needs are well met, while freeing police officers to deal with situations that require their specialized skills. In particular, there is a major disconnect between the mental health-related welfare checks that the police are being asked to do, and proper follow-up by provincial services. Reviewing, improving and advocating for a better system would ensure best outcomes. The best way to fill the gap would be to bolster the grassroots groups in the city that are currently in that space working with issues like mental illness, homelessness, addictions and other social issues. Providing resources and eliminating barriers to provide services and collaborate would be the easiest and most cost effective way forward.
Assign community liaison officers to each neighbourhood. By allowing police to get to know a neighbourhood and connect with that community we allow people to recognize people as police and we allow police to recognize people are people. Most interactions with police are associated with bad experiences, either you are in trouble with the law or you are a victim. This breeds conscious or unconscious fear of police and officers build a skewed view of people as the yonly see the worst. By bringing police back to neighbourhood patrols we would have police take ownership of their select neighbourhood, encourage pride in our police force and allow the police to find small problems before they become big problems.
2) Reduce wasteful spending through innovative solutions and thoughtful planning
City spending needs to be more thoughtfully evaluated. Having always done something one way does not make it the best way. Saskatoon is full of innovative people with amazing ideas, we need to engage and listen to our people to find the best solutions.
The middle class is not a cash cow. Free spending and tax increases in the face of economic downturn is tone deaf at best and needs to stop. Homeowner service fees (recycling, trash collection, storm surge insurance, etc.) that can not be opted out of are not service fees, but taxes, and should be reviewed. A city council that votes themselves a raise to offset increased taxes, yet increases property taxes, is elitist, tone deaf and ironic beyond measure. City councilors are on record noting that their pay is insufficient for their lifestyle despite being paid $69,467 for what is considered part-time work (See "Downtown discussion with Darren Hill | CTV News [4minutes]" at https://saskatoon.ctvnews.ca/ mobile/video?clipId=1538732 ). To put this in perspective, the median employment income in Saskatoon is $50,424.60 and the median household income is $67,713.20. With such an elitist and out-of-touch attitude, how can we trust them to represent the hard working families in Saskatoon?
Transparency is key. The rRemai mModern is over budget, but we don’t by know how much. Large construction projects are approved with little to no public consultation for large corporations while middle income families trying to run an Air-bnb are held to a higher standard, by having to spend thousands of dollars on public consultations.
In science the saying is "garbage in, garbage out". Our current level of data collection and reporting is poor and leads to poor decision making, wasting time, money and resources. Currently many reports from the City to the public are little more than sales brochures with little to no useful data. This weakens our ability to make good decisions as a council and as citizens. We need to have more robust rules around data collection and reporting. Whenever possible metrics and key performance indicators identified and shared publicly. With this in place we would vastly increase accountability and reduce wasteful spending.
The wild grass in ditches and turnouts should not be mowed as much. Not only is this practice wasteful and useless, turning beautiful native Western Canadian vegetation into unsightly short dead grass, but it engenders all types of other problems. This practice destroys local wildlife habitats, and promotes the growth of weeds such as foxtails. By reducing the grass cover the city increases dust and soil water loss leading to increased need for watering and street sweeping. Mowing ditches promotes erosion of the soils and leads to flooding, forcing us to spend extra money on erosion control, flood protection and storm sewer maintenance. A simple review of practices could save the city hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, money that could be spent better or be used to reduce taxes.
Downtown remains inaccessible for the average neighbourhood family. Who wants to get stuck in traffic, waste time looking for parking, and try to navigate downtown with a family of small children in tow? The council has been adding exclusive attractions downtown, while ignoring the core problems. The severe issues in traffic, parking and public transportation in our downtown will only get worse as more tourism-focused attractions are added. Yet, the solutions are simple. Like other cities, we can build several large, city-owned, multilevel parking garages around the downtown itself, with reliable shuttles from these parking structures to key downtown amenities and attractions. By having rapid, regular, and reliable shuttle service downtown, we can decrease congestion, increase foot traffic, and replace street parking stalls to increase flow and aesthetics.
City spending needs to be more thoughtfully evaluated. Having always done something one way does not make it the best way. Saskatoon is full of innovative people with amazing ideas, we need to engage and listen to our people to find the best solutions.
The middle class is not a cash cow. Free spending and tax increases in the face of economic downturn is tone deaf at best and needs to stop. Homeowner service fees (recycling, trash collection, storm surge insurance, etc.) that can not be opted out of are not service fees, but taxes, and should be reviewed. A city council that votes themselves a raise to offset increased taxes, yet increases property taxes, is elitist, tone deaf and ironic beyond measure. City councilors are on record noting that their pay is insufficient for their lifestyle despite being paid $69,467 for what is considered part-time work (See "Downtown discussion with Darren Hill | CTV News [4minutes]" at https://saskatoon.ctvnews.ca/ mobile/video?clipId=1538732 ). To put this in perspective, the median employment income in Saskatoon is $50,424.60 and the median household income is $67,713.20. With such an elitist and out-of-touch attitude, how can we trust them to represent the hard working families in Saskatoon?
Transparency is key. The rRemai mModern is over budget, but we don’t by know how much. Large construction projects are approved with little to no public consultation for large corporations while middle income families trying to run an Air-bnb are held to a higher standard, by having to spend thousands of dollars on public consultations.
In science the saying is "garbage in, garbage out". Our current level of data collection and reporting is poor and leads to poor decision making, wasting time, money and resources. Currently many reports from the City to the public are little more than sales brochures with little to no useful data. This weakens our ability to make good decisions as a council and as citizens. We need to have more robust rules around data collection and reporting. Whenever possible metrics and key performance indicators identified and shared publicly. With this in place we would vastly increase accountability and reduce wasteful spending.
The wild grass in ditches and turnouts should not be mowed as much. Not only is this practice wasteful and useless, turning beautiful native Western Canadian vegetation into unsightly short dead grass, but it engenders all types of other problems. This practice destroys local wildlife habitats, and promotes the growth of weeds such as foxtails. By reducing the grass cover the city increases dust and soil water loss leading to increased need for watering and street sweeping. Mowing ditches promotes erosion of the soils and leads to flooding, forcing us to spend extra money on erosion control, flood protection and storm sewer maintenance. A simple review of practices could save the city hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, money that could be spent better or be used to reduce taxes.
Downtown remains inaccessible for the average neighbourhood family. Who wants to get stuck in traffic, waste time looking for parking, and try to navigate downtown with a family of small children in tow? The council has been adding exclusive attractions downtown, while ignoring the core problems. The severe issues in traffic, parking and public transportation in our downtown will only get worse as more tourism-focused attractions are added. Yet, the solutions are simple. Like other cities, we can build several large, city-owned, multilevel parking garages around the downtown itself, with reliable shuttles from these parking structures to key downtown amenities and attractions. By having rapid, regular, and reliable shuttle service downtown, we can decrease congestion, increase foot traffic, and replace street parking stalls to increase flow and aesthetics.
3) Encourage economic development in local industries
The pandemic has proven that we must make ourselves more self-sustaining and resilient to fluctuations in the world economies. Our city must invest in infrastructure and industry that will guard us against future economic downturns. Projects that focus mostly on tourists, while offering little to our residents, should be limited in numbers. Building attractions and amenities useful to day-to-day life in the city should always come first.
Revitalizing neighbourhood should focus on local, unique small businesses and practical details not massive art galleries and event centers. The last four to eight years have seen extreme neglect in traditional neighbourhoods such as Forest Grove, Sutherland, Hudson Bay Park and Mayfair patched and broken roads and crumbling sidewalks contribute to a loss in of quality of life, loss of accessibility and decreased rates of home ownership in these areas. Focus should be brought back to areas of the city outside downtown and back to the places we live. We need people that will ensure the $3 billion allocated to municipalities for infrastructure is used in the areas that people live in order to keep neighbourhoods livable.
Despite the focus on the Downtown area practical solutions have eluded our current council. The Downtown is still a food desert, lacking a grocery store, decent parking and convenient public transportation. In their efforts to “revitalize downtown”, the city drove out its one and only farmers’ market, worsening the situation. People visit places that are livable and functional and will want to spend time downtown only if it is a livable area. Attention to practical details are not sexy but big vanity projects and events are not the solutions we need.
Ward 1 is home to so much brilliance and innovation. Innovation Place, Saskatchewan Polytechnic, and the University of Saskatchewan are only a few of the locations of brilliance in this Ward. We need to promote these spots of light to the city, the province, and the world. Let's stop the brain drain, encourage talent to stay in Saskatoon and work to create opportunities right here in our ward. We can strengthen our city by working with innovators, making Saskatoon more resilient to the fluctuations of world economies by promoting and supporting our tech and value added local industries. Often, the difference between a world changing business and a forgotten idea is a small amount of support. Interpreting and navigating through restrictive bureaucracy is a common stumbling block to economic improvement and should be reviewed. Farmer's markets and flea markets can give local innovators the chance to test products and refine them; rather than hamper and suppress these venues city council should help and encourage these economic incubators.
The pandemic has proven that we must make ourselves more self-sustaining and resilient to fluctuations in the world economies. Our city must invest in infrastructure and industry that will guard us against future economic downturns. Projects that focus mostly on tourists, while offering little to our residents, should be limited in numbers. Building attractions and amenities useful to day-to-day life in the city should always come first.
Revitalizing neighbourhood should focus on local, unique small businesses and practical details not massive art galleries and event centers. The last four to eight years have seen extreme neglect in traditional neighbourhoods such as Forest Grove, Sutherland, Hudson Bay Park and Mayfair patched and broken roads and crumbling sidewalks contribute to a loss in of quality of life, loss of accessibility and decreased rates of home ownership in these areas. Focus should be brought back to areas of the city outside downtown and back to the places we live. We need people that will ensure the $3 billion allocated to municipalities for infrastructure is used in the areas that people live in order to keep neighbourhoods livable.
Despite the focus on the Downtown area practical solutions have eluded our current council. The Downtown is still a food desert, lacking a grocery store, decent parking and convenient public transportation. In their efforts to “revitalize downtown”, the city drove out its one and only farmers’ market, worsening the situation. People visit places that are livable and functional and will want to spend time downtown only if it is a livable area. Attention to practical details are not sexy but big vanity projects and events are not the solutions we need.
Ward 1 is home to so much brilliance and innovation. Innovation Place, Saskatchewan Polytechnic, and the University of Saskatchewan are only a few of the locations of brilliance in this Ward. We need to promote these spots of light to the city, the province, and the world. Let's stop the brain drain, encourage talent to stay in Saskatoon and work to create opportunities right here in our ward. We can strengthen our city by working with innovators, making Saskatoon more resilient to the fluctuations of world economies by promoting and supporting our tech and value added local industries. Often, the difference between a world changing business and a forgotten idea is a small amount of support. Interpreting and navigating through restrictive bureaucracy is a common stumbling block to economic improvement and should be reviewed. Farmer's markets and flea markets can give local innovators the chance to test products and refine them; rather than hamper and suppress these venues city council should help and encourage these economic incubators.
4) Invest in waste management and other infrastructure to turn a negative into a positive
Waste management infrastructure needs to be improved in order to "futureproof" our current landfill capacity, create jobs and reduce the cost of waste management for citizens and businesses. Several other cities have been able to use available technology to recycle, upcycle and downcycle household and industrial waste, decreasing the amount of waste going into their landfill, and in some cases creating a source of revenue for the city. It is time for Saskatoon to lead the province by supporting the development of an industry that can either value-add to our current valuable plastics or downcycle through pyrolysis the remaining, less valuable plastics into natural gas or diesel. Our city council needs to put out a call to the University, Polytech and/or industry for projects that can process and divert more of our waste, turning waste into sellable commodities and diverting them from the landfill. This would provide jobs during construction and long term jobs for the operation of such a facility. If designed appropriately, the diversion and management of wastes from other municipalities surrounding Saskatoon would increase the longevity of their landfills, create jobs in the surrounding areas and could become a source of income for public coffers in the long run.
Saskatchewan is one of the sunniest places in the world. We need to proactively and aggressively promote and invest in solar power. I propose putting solar panels on public buildings, such as libraries and community centers. This would make those buildings more self-sufficient, reducing the city’s energy bills, and may even prove to be a source of revenue if enough power is produced to send back into the grid. Moreover, this would be an excellent way of supporting the local industry and helping it grow and export its products to the world, and can be used as a teaching tool for schoolchildren, Polytech and University students, and for the general population.
Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) program financing for homeowners and businesses. PACE financing offered through the City of Saskatoon could be offered as a low interest loans and micro loans to business and home owners to upgrade insulation, wiring, electrical, plumbing, doors and widows. The city would be providing an economic boost to our trades sector, business owners and house owners by giving them access to financing. This would increase the value of homes and businesses, create countless jobs, and save homeowners and businesses money through energy and utility savings. This could be coupled with the provincially proposed system to fully leverage this system.
Waste management infrastructure needs to be improved in order to "futureproof" our current landfill capacity, create jobs and reduce the cost of waste management for citizens and businesses. Several other cities have been able to use available technology to recycle, upcycle and downcycle household and industrial waste, decreasing the amount of waste going into their landfill, and in some cases creating a source of revenue for the city. It is time for Saskatoon to lead the province by supporting the development of an industry that can either value-add to our current valuable plastics or downcycle through pyrolysis the remaining, less valuable plastics into natural gas or diesel. Our city council needs to put out a call to the University, Polytech and/or industry for projects that can process and divert more of our waste, turning waste into sellable commodities and diverting them from the landfill. This would provide jobs during construction and long term jobs for the operation of such a facility. If designed appropriately, the diversion and management of wastes from other municipalities surrounding Saskatoon would increase the longevity of their landfills, create jobs in the surrounding areas and could become a source of income for public coffers in the long run.
Saskatchewan is one of the sunniest places in the world. We need to proactively and aggressively promote and invest in solar power. I propose putting solar panels on public buildings, such as libraries and community centers. This would make those buildings more self-sufficient, reducing the city’s energy bills, and may even prove to be a source of revenue if enough power is produced to send back into the grid. Moreover, this would be an excellent way of supporting the local industry and helping it grow and export its products to the world, and can be used as a teaching tool for schoolchildren, Polytech and University students, and for the general population.
Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) program financing for homeowners and businesses. PACE financing offered through the City of Saskatoon could be offered as a low interest loans and micro loans to business and home owners to upgrade insulation, wiring, electrical, plumbing, doors and widows. The city would be providing an economic boost to our trades sector, business owners and house owners by giving them access to financing. This would increase the value of homes and businesses, create countless jobs, and save homeowners and businesses money through energy and utility savings. This could be coupled with the provincially proposed system to fully leverage this system.
5) Hold elected officials to a higher standard
Attendance and voting at City Council meetings should not be an afterthought. Many Councilors boast being on numerous committees outside of the city hall duty, but many also miss meetings, neglect to vote on certain topics, or change their minds after a vote, costing the city time and money. A Councilor's focus should be on the civic functions they were elected to perform. Missed meetings should result in a dock in pay.
Ward 1 has been neglected. Over the last 14 years, we have seen no significant improvements to Ward 1. Central Avenue did get a small revitalization, but in the process lost its festival (Rayna’s Day of Play) and several businesses (such as the Sutherland Hotel). In fact, Sutherland, Richmond Heights, Kelsey-Woodlawn and Forest Grove have been a cash cow for projects in other wards. Kinsmen Park and the Children’s Museum, although nice, are more accessible to Ward 6 and as far from anyone living in Ward 1 as it possibly can be without being in Ward 6.
Public money is used to fund exclusive vanity projects, to the detriment of the average Saskatoon resident. The Mendel Art Gallery and its conservatory, for which admission was free, was transformed into the rRemai, an exclusive paying attraction (now located downtown instead of Ward 1), while the Mendel building was transformed into the (pay-to-admit) Children’s Museum. Permanent festival site and the downtown arena are being planned, which will be difficult to access for most of our citizens due to the lack of parking and constant traffic issues downtown. This is a prime example of how our tax money is being funneled out of the neighbourhoods to transform public, unique attractions into exclusive vanity projects accessible to fewer citizens.
Pay should be proportionate to results. Instead of seeing Councilors vote themselves a pay increase (which is a much bigger conflict of interest than other reasons cited for neglecting to vote on other topics), let’s anchor their pay on the median income of the people of Saskatoon. A leader’s remuneration should be based on their successes (or failures) in helping better the lives of the people they represent.
Other Specific Issues:
Library
I am publicly for the library for several reasons:
1) if we back out now we lose credibility as a city. We will signal to every other partner that we cannot sign contracts for projects that last for more than 4 years or that we cannot sign contracts a year before an election.
2) If we back out entirely we will still spend money, cripple the Saskatoon Public Library and have nothing to show for it.
3) The construction of the library will provide jobs, the library will also provide long term jobs.
4) The library will increase tourism from other cities within the province. Owning and operating an entertainment center in Saskatoon I know that interprovincial tourism is a major source of income for Saskatoon.
5) It will provide a space for social programing and convention space.
6) We should have built this library or modified the old one ten years ago but we have been constantly putting this off.
7) This is a loan and interest rates are at a historic low, now is the time to borrow the money as it is the least expensive time to do so.
8)The Central Library will be built near the most densely populated area in the city (and Ward 1). Beyond being a library it will provide public space and amenities for the people in these high rises and condos.
9) To vote to rescind the library loan is probably moot as things have been put in motion. The promise to rescind is a promise that cannot be kept, it is short sighted and wrong.
I am worried about the construction of the library because we have a major problem with transparency in the city. I am concerned it will go over, I am concerned that the land bought cost $9 million dollars but the sale of the old library lot will only bring in $5 million.
Transparency should be the issue here, not the library. If we can fix problems around reporting then we will save more money than what was promised for this construction in the long run.
Lighthouse
I believe the Lighthouse is overwhelmed and we need to build up our capacity to deliver social services throughout the city in order to deal with this issue long term. I don't believe moving a problem is solving a problem. I also think that moving the Lighthouse is probably impossible both legally and socially. The Lighthouse is privately owned and therefore it is unlikely it can be forced to move. Socially we would run into "not in my backyard" issues. Those that suggest that moving the Lighthouse is the easiest action has probably not given the issue enough thought.
By dealing with the issues surrounding the Lighthouse instead of sweeping them under the rug we would be able to reduce crime city wide, increase prosperity and save money in the long run. We should be working on increasing the amount of low income housing for seniors and others in the city as well as bolstering the groups in the city that do work with mental health, addiction and poverty issues. We should also have a serious conversation about whether it is time for the construction of another shelter in Saskatoon. Dealing with these issues in a proactive way would help to relieve the pressure on the Lighthouse and the downtown, reduce crime, increase prosperity by making people with crippling issues more productive and free up our Saskatoon Police Services to concentrate on the predators taking advantage of social issues rather than those suffering.
Bike lanes
I think the current bike lanes have been set up to fail. While I am a fan of active transport I think we can do better through innovative thinking. There have been a couple innovative suggestions coming from John Naylor in Ward 6 that has suggested that back alleys could be used for bike lanes. This could help make them more connected, get increased use of space, reduce crime by having more eyes on these areas and reduce conflict between bikers and motorists. I believe that if the lanes were more functional we would see increased use especially in our more densely populated areas.
Darren Hill and Kevin Boychuck are also in Ward 1.
As your representative on City Council, I vow to be a proactive and innovative voice to help build a brighter future for Saskatoon.
I ask for the honour to represent you at City Council. On November 9th, can I count on your vote?
I ask for the honour to represent you at City Council. On November 9th, can I count on your vote?
